Since the Harvey Weinstein sexual assault trial began last month, some of the details behind his alleged harassment and assault have been unsettling and befuddling. Some of the testimony brought up against the former movie producer has involved the unsolicited gifting of chocolate penises, graphic sexual assault details, and claims of absentee testicles. Now, Jessica Mann, the same woman who described Weinstein’s genitals as deformed, has testified that the former mogul urinated on her without consent. 

Angela Weiss/Getty Images

According to Page Six, the former aspiring actress recounted to Manhattan Supreme Court jurors that Weinstein had urinated on her while the two were in the shower together. During her testimony, Mann stated:

“We were in the shower. He wanted to shower first which was beneficial to me … and he asked me to come into the shower and then he said to me, ‘Have you ever had a golden shower,’ and I said ‘no’ and then I felt him peeing on me.”

Weinstein’s defense lawyer, Donna Rotunno attempted to invalidate Jessica Mann’s claims stating that she kept seeing the former Hollywood heavyweight for her own personal benefit and asked if Mann chose to leave following the event she was peed on, to which Mann replied, “No.”

Rotunno continued to allude that Mann was a consenting party to Weinstein’s ‘golden shower’ as Mann replied again, this time holding back tears:

“I was in shock by it. It was gross … I turned into the corner of the shower and just looked away.” 

Weinstein’s defense attorney continued to badger Mann during their cross-examination claiming that the 34-year-old had changed her phone number approximately five times between 2013 and 2017, but consensually sent her new number to Weinstein each time in hopes of benefitting from what Weinstein had to offer. 

The former actress revealed that Weinstein could have possibly been manipulating throughout their relationship stating:

“I guess it was an aspect of how I felt I needed to protect myself. I guess maybe you could say it was manipulating.”

Last Friday, Mann testified that Weinstein allegedly raped her twice, once at the Doubletree Hotel in New York in March 2013, and an additional time in Los Angeles later that same year. 

As of right now, Harvey Weinstein has only been charged of sexual assault against Mann in the alleged March incident. His other two accusers, Miriam ‘Mimi’ Haleyi and actress Annabella Sciorra have also testified that he forcibly assaulted them. If convicted, Harvey Weinstein faces a maximum sentence of life in prison. 

Check out the footage of Harvey Weinstein and Jessica Mann entering the Manhattan Superior Court on Monday (Feb. 3) in the video provided below. 

With all the charges being brought against R. Kelly in both federal and state courts, it seems highly unlikely that he will become a free man any time soon. Regardless, he is denying accusations wherever he can and one particular case is proving especially challenging for him to defend himself. 

In his federal trial taking place in Brooklyn, the disgraced singer has been fighting to get two of his accusers identified, as they are currently listed as Jane Doe No. 2 and Jane Doe No. 3 in court papers. A few weeks ago, Kelly’s lawyer, Steve Greenberg, wrote a letter to the judge pleading for the accusers’ names to be released to help Kelly’s team prepare for the trial. “It is impossible to interview witnesses, to search for records, or to do anything without this information,” Greenberg wrote. 

Scott Olson/Getty Images

Despite Greenberg’s argument, Brooklyn Federal Judge Ann Donnelly is refusing to cooperate. According to Page Six, The request was formally denied on Wednesday (Jan. 29), as prosecutors informed Donnelly that Kelly has a history of using intimidation tactics against his accusers. An example was cited of Kelly sending a threatening letter to Heather Williams, who filed a lawsuit against him for giving her herpes in 2017 when she was 19. In the letter, Kelly supposedly told Williams that if she “really cares about her own reputation she should cease her participation and association with the organizers of this negative campaign.” The court papers also state that he warned her that “counter actions are in the developmental stages and due to be released soon.”

Kelly’s legal team will have to find a way to move forward without the alleged victims’ names. Jane Doe No. 2 claims the defendant had sex with her in 1999, when she was 16 years. Jane Doe No. 3 claims that, between 2003 and 2004, Kelly locked her in a bedroom in a Chicago recording studio for three days without food and sexually assaulted her while she was unconscious.